本文信息基于PG13.1。
從PG9.6開始支持并行查詢。PG11開始支持CREATE TABLE … AS、SELECT INTO以及CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW的并行查詢。
先說結(jié)論：
換用create table as 或者select into或者導(dǎo)入導(dǎo)出。
首先跟蹤如下查詢語句的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ;postgres=# explain analyze select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Finalize Aggregate (cost=34244.16..34244.17 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=683.246..715.324 rows=1 loops=1) -> Gather (cost=34243.95..34244.16 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=681.474..715.311 rows=3 loops=1) Workers Planned: 2 Workers Launched: 2 -> Partial Aggregate (cost=33243.95..33243.96 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=674.689..675.285 rows=1 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash Join (cost=15428.00..32202.28 rows=416667 width=0) (actual time=447.799..645.689 rows=333333 loops=3) Hash Cond: (t1.id = t2.id) -> Parallel Seq Scan on test t1 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.025..74.010 rows=333333 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash (cost=8591.67..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=260.052..260.053 rows=333333 loops=3) Buckets: 131072 Batches: 16 Memory Usage: 3520kB -> Parallel Seq Scan on test1 t2 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.032..104.804 rows=333333 loops=3) Planning Time: 0.420 ms Execution Time: 715.447 ms(13 rows) |
可以看到走了兩個(gè)Workers。
下邊看一下insert into select：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
postgres=# explain analyze insert into va select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insert on va (cost=73228.00..73228.02 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=3744.179..3744.187 rows=0 loops=1) -> Subquery Scan on "*SELECT*" (cost=73228.00..73228.02 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=3743.343..3743.352 rows=1 loops=1) -> Aggregate (cost=73228.00..73228.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=3743.247..3743.254 rows=1 loops=1) -> Hash Join (cost=30832.00..70728.00 rows=1000000 width=0) (actual time=1092.295..3511.301 rows=1000000 loops=1) Hash Cond: (t1.id = t2.id) -> Seq Scan on test t1 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=0.030..421.537 rows=1000000 loops=1) -> Hash (cost=14425.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=1090.078..1090.081 rows=1000000 loops=1) Buckets: 131072 Batches: 16 Memory Usage: 3227kB -> Seq Scan on test1 t2 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=0.021..422.768 rows=1000000 loops=1) Planning Time: 0.511 ms Execution Time: 3745.633 ms(11 rows) |
可以看到并沒有Workers的指示，沒有啟用并行查詢。
即使開啟強(qiáng)制并行，也無法走并行查詢。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
postgres=# set force_parallel_mode =on;SETpostgres=# explain analyze insert into va select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insert on va (cost=73228.00..73228.02 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=3825.042..3825.049 rows=0 loops=1) -> Subquery Scan on "*SELECT*" (cost=73228.00..73228.02 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=3824.976..3824.984 rows=1 loops=1) -> Aggregate (cost=73228.00..73228.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=3824.972..3824.978 rows=1 loops=1) -> Hash Join (cost=30832.00..70728.00 rows=1000000 width=0) (actual time=1073.587..3599.402 rows=1000000 loops=1) Hash Cond: (t1.id = t2.id) -> Seq Scan on test t1 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=0.034..414.965 rows=1000000 loops=1) -> Hash (cost=14425.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=1072.441..1072.443 rows=1000000 loops=1) Buckets: 131072 Batches: 16 Memory Usage: 3227kB -> Seq Scan on test1 t2 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=4) (actual time=0.022..400.624 rows=1000000 loops=1) Planning Time: 0.577 ms Execution Time: 3825.923 ms(11 rows) |
原因在官方文檔有寫：
The query writes any data or locks any database rows. If a query contains a data-modifying operation either at the top level or within a CTE, no parallel plans for that query will be generated. As an exception, the commands CREATE TABLE … AS, SELECT INTO, and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW which create a new table and populate it can use a parallel plan.
解決方案有如下三種：
1.select into
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
postgres=# explain analyze select count(*) into vaa from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Finalize Aggregate (cost=34244.16..34244.17 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=742.736..774.923 rows=1 loops=1) -> Gather (cost=34243.95..34244.16 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=740.223..774.907 rows=3 loops=1) Workers Planned: 2 Workers Launched: 2 -> Partial Aggregate (cost=33243.95..33243.96 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=731.408..731.413 rows=1 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash Join (cost=15428.00..32202.28 rows=416667 width=0) (actual time=489.880..700.830 rows=333333 loops=3) Hash Cond: (t1.id = t2.id) -> Parallel Seq Scan on test t1 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.033..87.479 rows=333333 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash (cost=8591.67..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=266.839..266.840 rows=333333 loops=3) Buckets: 131072 Batches: 16 Memory Usage: 3520kB -> Parallel Seq Scan on test1 t2 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.058..106.874 rows=333333 loops=3) Planning Time: 0.319 ms Execution Time: 783.300 ms(13 rows) |
2.create table as
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
postgres=# explain analyze create table vb as select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id ; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finalize Aggregate (cost=34244.16..34244.17 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=540.120..563.733 rows=1 loops=1) -> Gather (cost=34243.95..34244.16 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=537.982..563.720 rows=3 loops=1) Workers Planned: 2 Workers Launched: 2 -> Partial Aggregate (cost=33243.95..33243.96 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=526.602..527.136 rows=1 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash Join (cost=15428.00..32202.28 rows=416667 width=0) (actual time=334.532..502.793 rows=333333 loops=3) Hash Cond: (t1.id = t2.id) -> Parallel Seq Scan on test t1 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.018..57.819 rows=333333 loops=3) -> Parallel Hash (cost=8591.67..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=189.502..189.503 rows=333333 loops=3) Buckets: 131072 Batches: 16 Memory Usage: 3520kB -> Parallel Seq Scan on test1 t2 (cost=0.00..8591.67 rows=416667 width=4) (actual time=0.023..77.786 rows=333333 loops=3) Planning Time: 0.189 ms Execution Time: 565.448 ms(13 rows) |
3.或者通過導(dǎo)入導(dǎo)出的方式，例如：
|
1
2
|
psql -h localhost -d postgres -U postgres -c "select count(*) from test t1,test1 t2 where t1.id = t2.id " -o result.csv -A -t -F ","psql -h localhost -d postgres -U postgres -c "COPY va FROM 'result.csv' WITH (FORMAT CSV, DELIMITER ',', HEADER FALSE, ENCODING 'windows-1252')" |
一些場(chǎng)景下也會(huì)比非并行快。
補(bǔ)充：POSTGRESQL: 動(dòng)態(tài)SQL語句中不能使用SELECT INTO？
我的數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)版本是 PostgreSQL 8.4.7 。 下面是出錯(cuò)的存儲(chǔ)過程：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
CREATE or Replace FUNCTION func_getnextid( tablename varchar(240), idname varchar(20) default 'id')RETURNS integer AS $funcbody$Declare sqlstring varchar(240); currentId integer;Begin sqlstring:= 'select max("' || idname || '") into currentId from "' || tablename || '";'; EXECUTE sqlstring; if currentId is NULL or currentId = 0 then return 1; else return currentId + 1; end if;End;$funcbody$ LANGUAGE plpgsq |
執(zhí)行后出現(xiàn)這樣的錯(cuò)誤：
SQL error:
ERROR: EXECUTE of SELECT ... INTO is not implemented
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "func_getnextbigid" line 6 at EXECUTE statement
改成這樣的就對(duì)了：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
CREATE or Replace FUNCTION func_getnextid( tablename varchar(240), idname varchar(20) default 'id')RETURNS integer AS $funcbody$Declare sqlstring varchar(240); currentId integer;Begin sqlstring:= 'select max("' || idname || '") from "' || tablename || '";'; EXECUTE sqlstring into currentId; if currentId is NULL or currentId = 0 then return 1; else return currentId + 1; end if;End;$funcbody$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; |
以上為個(gè)人經(jīng)驗(yàn)，希望能給大家一個(gè)參考，也希望大家多多支持服務(wù)器之家。如有錯(cuò)誤或未考慮完全的地方，望不吝賜教。
原文鏈接：https://blog.csdn.net/pg_hgdb/article/details/112297250
